In the sixties, punk Leslie Cheung, the immortal aristocrats yearned for a thorough civilian decadence here in Tony Leung Chiu Wai.
Teddy boy finally stopped feeling inexplicably disappointed with his distant mother’s homeland, stopped dancing on the balcony intoxicated and lonely, and stopped pretending to stick to his bottom line indifferently.
Teddy boy is excited to be ready for the coming neon night. Although he has waxed his head meticulously and stuffed a handkerchief into his west pocket carefully, you can hear him whistling secretly and snickering. This belongs to the wild night of civilians. From then on, he will return home with romantic nostalgia and melancholy. He has embraced this immortal flying heart. It belongs to the virtual night.
After the’ 60s, Teddy Tony Leung Chiu Wai won’t dance in the wind like Leslie Cheung, but he must show his seductive figure when designing for Leslie Cheung. He exudes a sweet and choking breath when twisting his waist and swinging his hips. He is a little bit melodramatic, a little sad and a little sad, just like Beales’ clear and melancholy line, a photo of water is covered with a red cloth, and your nostalgia is filled with yellow and bright.
The sixties is a symbol of revolutionary passion, romanticism, and the last light to shine. It is the last time that the world turned around and stared at the bourgeois revolutionary masses before falling into the night. The world history ended in the sixties, when the street fighting in Paris ended in the highway in the western United States, when hippies poisoned tobacco, and when the wet poison spread in the jungle of South Vietnam. Although punk from Hong Kong didn’t have the chance to experience the history, he could still breathe in the Pacific Ocean and stir up the sea breeze, but he could walk away alone and hold his head high and refuse the civic culture. Since then, the word aristocratic revolution has really disappeared from the dictionary.
It is said that Leslie Cheung is hiding behind a gorgeous coat, so Tony Leung Chiu Wai is sad without hurting the music, but not lewd. It is light tobacco, clean and soapy, sexy, and Tony Leung Chiu Wai doesn’t smile and sway. He needs to stand in the corner in that unchanging white shirt and then hold a cigarette in his mouth to get his taste.
Tony Leung Chiu Wai, but I don’t love him. There is no aristocratic pride in his blood. You know that’s how he grew up. He doesn’t write an inappropriate belly on his face like Leslie Cheung. His civilian status is as white as his white shirt. You can feel that he is a little depressed, but it’s hard to figure out what he is really depressed about.
Tony Leung Chiu Wai is decadent and not arrogant. When he plunges himself into the sofa, your heart sinks with him. When his eyes stare at you, you can see the loneliness in his eyes. Living in another place makes you feel excited, but you know that he is just drifting. Although he can’t yearn for it, he is unwilling to live in Cao Cao’s heart.
Tony Leung Chiu Wai is a person in the true state. What is the state state is that you hold your body, your eyes and your posture.
In the state, people’s personality is really pure without impurities. When they look at a world event with a single color sunglasses, the world of people in the state has no time for events, and his world has been erased. In all events, the unity of man and nature in the state of the world is like the combination of god and form in the dark flower. When Tony Leung Chiu Wai is driving from door to door in Macau street looking for a killer, he hits the suspect’s right hand with a intact damaged bottle again and again. In fact, it matters what he hits. What matters is that what he eventually hits is his own state.
Tony Leung Chiu Wai is the flying knife in Li Xun’s hand. No one has ever seen it, but everyone in the Jianghu knows that Xiao Li’s flying knife is more lethal than A Fei Jian.
Leslie Cheung is a teddy boy with a sharp sword in his hand, but it is not touching. Looking at him is like watching a stage play. You know he is sincere, but you also know that he is far away and pretentious. He loves the kind of dust that goes away, the speed that abandons people is also unique.
Tony Leung Chiu Wai is us and Leslie Cheung is them.
Wong Kar-wai didn’t shoot punk, and Tony Leung Chiu Wai’s last scene in punk finally ended. In fact, Wong Kar-wai has to shoot another sequel, because punk lives in this world, because our world is punk’s world.
In 1999,
Live silently and poetically.
A kind of shadow is not destined to entertain the public, just as some countries are destined to have no face, some rivers are destined to have no names, and some people are destined to open their mouths but not make a sound.
Ever since Duras’ novels swept Apocalypse Now and succeeded, Vietnam was destined to endure humiliation and drag out an ignoble existence in the imagination of Orientalism. In the memory of the French, Vietnam symbolized that it had been intoxicated by the spring breeze of its colonial career and indulged in exotic love, while in the eyes of the Americans, Vietnam could not shake off its nightmare and left several young and flying lives in the crazy six years forever.
Fortunately, however, in the rickshaw pullers, we didn’t see the post-colonial curiosity distorting Chen Yingxiong, who was born and raised in southern Vietnam and directed in France with a broad and compassionate mind, giving a real contemporary Vietnam.
The plot of a tricycle driver is not complicated. A grandfather and sister depend on each other. A tricycle driver was forced to sell his car for ransom to join the triad society because his car was stolen. At the same time, his sister was forced to engage in prostitution. A depressed mysterious poet became involved in a crazy world full of sexual crimes and violence.
The shooting style of the film is lyrical and realistic. Most scenes are composed of street scenes or mixed with colorful and bizarre pictures. The film is dazzled by the extremely rich texture of the lens. With Chen Yingxiong, there is no doubt that Chen Yingxiong transported a lot of western art elements in this film, but the tricycle driver is by no means a mediocre formalism. On the contrary, this is a realistic film full of cement, which demonstrates that the hero deeply criticizes the real situation in time coordinates and the transcendental pursuit of the other side of the world. The film perfectly blends hard power and cruel beauty.
Moderate pain makes people talk endlessly, while too much suffering makes people suffer silently. Even in the face of sudden changes, the characters in the tricycle driver rarely speak, and their reaction is silent. A scene that I remember deeply makes the tricycle driver undergo routine inspection at the intersection. Suddenly, a group of riotous people swept through the street and violently fought and tore at the police in silence. The routine process of marching forward was short and jumbled, with no sound effect. The hand photography became more and more prominent, silent and aggressive, similar to the image in the tricycle. Every face in the driver’s repeated scenes presents a strange and calm expression. It is in this lively image that the depressed emotions form great tension, which makes people almost suffocate and shock. In front of the cruel and aesthetic lens of the director, you can feel the unique charm of the film language.
The most puzzling thing is that in the face of such a land full of suffering and tears of despair, Chen Yingxiong still maintains an abundant and high-spirited poetic vision, and the peeping lens is often inserted and cut in every unexpected place like a knife by the director with full emotions to break through a large lyric scene.
No name river When I was born, I sobbed darkly. The blue sky, the earth and the streams were dark. Year after year, I gradually grew up. No one asked me carefully. No name, no name, no color, no flowers, and the fragrance was fragrant.
In the song, Tony Leung Chiu Wai plays the role of a poet and a child, closing his eyes and listening attentively to what makes these ill-fated people feel at ease in the face of suffering. They are in their proper places in the chaos.
Obviously, this kind of poetic romance is not German romantic comfort. It is a kind of silence and poetic living state, which is called silence. Poetry or poetic silence is not in it. There are flowers and flowers, but there are no tears, suffering and despair. It is just a moment of mourning. It is a trip across mountains and mountains to go home, and it is known that know life will know its final peace. In this sense, Chen Yingxiong has gone beyond the clear meaning of Vietnam, but is directly writing a story that belongs to the level of life theory. This story belongs to every stranger who is full of tears for his homeland.
In 1999,
Lyricism is a disease.
I am the editor-in-chief of fashion magazine, and Meng Jinghui must be the first choice for the June issue. Although critics say that Meng Jinghui has been fighting against fashion, when you see so many audiences flocking to Qingyi small theater, and the steps are full of pious young people, who can deny that Meng Jinghui is not synonymous with fashion? After watching the rhinoceros in love, the only thing that makes me white is that pioneers are those who deny current fashion to prove that they are fashionable.
However, an embarrassing fact for the audience is that although the drama is full of disdain for life imitation and video teasing, we have not found anything beyond video life from the drama. Because this drama, which grew up in a garbage dump, didn’t tell us anything new. It’s not the fault that the director and screenwriter’s imagination didn’t depend on it, but who can pull out his hair and rise to the growth base of popular video drama, at the same time, it is doomed that a drama is negative, affirmative and critical. In fact, it is not constructive. We can find new life from it. The trace of living breath means that resistance to the indifferent real world is either hysterical, and this kind of emotion is very touching. There are many lyrical feelings in Huanzhu Gege during the same period, but the road where the other hero is deliberately shaped is not necessary for Erkang drama. I don’t think it is necessary to take a two-hour bus to Qingyi small theater for re-education
The choice of Guo Tao wuyue as the hero and heroine makes people suspect that Meng Jinghui has ulterior motives. As we all know, these two are vested interests in the soap opera era, and they have played several earth-shattering love roles respectively. This almost self-evident irony especially makes me sad. wuyue’s performance has little strength, and Guo Tao’s strength may be greater. The small theater effect allows me to truly witness the tears in his forehead and eyes. It is also not surprising that the roles in peacetime should be sealed to the stage. That’s what the actors and directors mean. You are such a master who smells like a printer from watching drama to stage.
The drama seems to mean that in such a post-modernist era, although love is dazzling, it is vulnerable, but the ending is not confusing. I don’t always have a youthful passion, and my life seems to be struggling to make this out-of-date lyric stick to the end. The plot is like a popular TV series. Think about Huang Shujun’s love syndrome, which is more than 1,000 words long and 99 words are a blow to ridicule those who brush their teeth and take a shower. How do people get up in the middle of the night to play the piano? It seems that Meng Jinghui’s expression ability is not as fast as Huang Shujun’s and hits the nail on the head. However, in the last remaining words, the style of music turns sharply, tender and tender, the sea is dry and the rocks are rotten, and lyricism finally replaces disdain, irony, love, the tide is mighty, and all worldly fetters are broken. It is said that Liao Yimei wants to express something, but it is obviously too simple and commonplace. It is these tunes that are put on all day. I don’t know why I want to express it in this luxurious form of drama.
Of course, of course, we can’t compare the accidental death of a government with a rhinoceros in love. After all, not many people are profound and broad, but the style of directors before and after Meng Jinghui can still be compared. In short, no breakthrough is still Shandong Fast, slang is still a folk slang, and classical artists may be able to repeat themselves again and again, but modern artists can run forward like a dog chased by innovation. This is their fate stagnation, which means death and love rhinoceros. The fate is not that the theme falls into urban love, and there is not much breakthrough in the form. Meng Jinghui plays are like a pile of potatoes falling from a broken cloth bag. Every one of them is real and funny. Every one of them is a big small party. The audience is waiting for a small wonderful performance in the later stage of laughter. Guo Tao Wu Yue is the host of this party.
Feeling a little bit in relaxed freehand brushwork is called true feelings. Perhaps this is the only expectation of the audience in this era.
In 1999,
Tell the truth or just say it.
To tell the truth, after playing Cui Yongyuan Zhaoshan Song Dandan together in a large-scale small party, I became more and more convinced of this view. On March 1, when Liang Tian made another gag appearance in telling the truth, the accuracy of the view was once again confirmed. It can be seen from the laughter of the audience in Zhaoshan, Liang Tian that the theme of this issue is a dollar lawsuit. Obviously, it is an echo of 315. When wearing sunglasses, Wang Hai has become a patron saint. I will talk about this topic today. It is not that I have nothing to say.
The incident was very simple. A Shanxi teacher bought a page in a store in Haidian, Beijing, only to find that it was missing. So he made a special trip back to Beijing to ask for a refund and asked the store to take the attitude of returning to and from the store. The reason why he could not retreat was that the store had no such regulations and no laws. Who knows what you came to Beijing to tell the truth? The on-site discussion revolved around the first question. It seems simple to check the facts and act according to the law. However, the focus of the scene is more on the second point. Liang Tian said, who knows who you are? I didn’t go back to the cinema and visit the Forbidden City and then stop by the store to change it. In fact, this kind of view can be thick. There are many people who are more serious these days, but more people are highly vigilant about this kind of personnel protection. It is a sign of high awareness and another audience. Is it more acute for you to do this? However, in my opinion, the arguments have deviated from this matter and stayed at the level of general life or, more precisely, the level of Mohism.
Perhaps the law here has raised some issues worthy of discussion. His main points are as follows: 1. Spending a dollar at a cost of nearly 3,000 yuan is contrary to the maximization of interests, which is a great wave of national resources and personal wealth. Because of such a trivial conflict, disputes involving personal energy affect the work and trouble the court, which will lead to instability. It is not worth the loss. Everyone will be paralyzed if the teacher goes to court for a dollar. 3. Litigation is a professional. Teachers should not give up their employees and join the law. The law gives people the power to protect their legitimate interests, but at the same time, the law guarantees people to live a happy and beautiful life, and this teacher does not live a happy life, which also leads others to live a bad life.
This legal point of view involves several levels of meaning. On the first point, I basically agree with an audience present that this is a vulgar economic point of view, saying that the reason for violating the maximization of interests is only superficial. Obviously, we can object to the opinion that this teacher has a potential social benefit, which is measured by the ready-made money of the law
As far as the second point is concerned, whether this matter is trivial depends on the angle from which you send it. From the point of view of one yuan, it is of course trivial, but from the point of view of safeguarding personal interests, it is more serious than affecting the work. He went to court and caused absenteeism. Of course, it is out of line, but he has resigned, which is another matter because it is his personal choice to ask him not to violate the law. The basic moral standards are still questionable, and others will intervene substantially except public opinion. It is even more puzzling when it comes to troublesome courts, China. One of the reasons for the weakness of the construction of the rule of law is that people are subconsciously troubled. Of course, based on China’s powerful moral position, we don’t have to blindly follow the legal criterion of Anglo-American system, but we can properly regulate people’s practice of a law by rural regulations and moral education. It is wrong to say that people should behave like this teacher again, and it will be a fundamental logic error. This expansion from a single empirical statement to a symmetrical statement is outrageous, and this defense is quite powerless, just like you are right about three. When a child says that you shouldn’t pick your nose, it will make you sick to death. Moreover, the fact may be that this teacher is a person who specializes in setting the law of phase, so that no one else can go to the scene for such things completely. An audience joke has made you a billion people.
I think it is a common sense question whether professionals are qualified to go to court, so there is no need to discuss it here. In fact, it is the fourth point of view that I am really interested in. Let’s review a law first, which gives people the power to make profits and protect their legitimate interests, but at the same time, the law guarantees people to live a happy and beautiful life, and the teacher’s life is not good, which also leads others to live a bad life. In fact, the previous sentence actually admitted the teacher’s legal weapons to protect his legitimate interests. This seems to be a common sense question. The key lies in the latter sentence, which involves legal and moral issues
Obviously, this law is confused with legal morality at two levels. In his view, the law should not maintain the normal order of society, but should ensure people to live a happy and beautiful life. Whether the law contains morality at its origin is another more complicated topic. In my opinion, the function of legal morality is different in terms of design level. It is a good law, so it will effectively ensure the normal operation of the society, but it does not necessarily guarantee that it will be a happy and beautiful one because of happiness in its essence. It is not universal, but varies from person to person. The law is generally binding on people in the meeting. Its norms are in the field of public life, but morality is not. Although morality is high, it is special. The scope of its binding effect occurs in the field outside the law. Although it can dictate the private life, it is not natural and legal. Therefore, it is quite reasonable for an individual to do what the law allows, even if he violates morality or, more broadly, public opinion. As far as personal life planning is concerned, law and morality are interlinked. The teacher decided to protect it by law. Obstructing one’s legitimate interests is not because of the abstraction, but because of his feelings about my happy life. Maybe in his view, a life will be happy if he doesn’t fight this lawsuit. He is protecting his happy life through law.
Here we find a very interesting phenomenon. The law is precisely to destroy the happy life to refute this teacher’s contradiction. Because it is very simple to understand the difference between teachers and happy life, the question now is whether you can deny another person’s value body by virtue of one’s own value body. Further, dozens of children have lost an experienced grade leader because of the teacher’s resignation. Is it important for these dozens of children to live happily or for this teacher’s personal happiness? The issues involved here are both root and complex. I want to point out that personal morality does not have natural legitimacy for him, and it cannot falsify his personal life choices.
During the discussion, the law said that a resident of Haidian District bought a cabbage and made a special trip to Dongcheng District, so people would think that this person was unusual. Regardless of the meanness of criticizing others, we can draw such a conclusion. 1. This law made the mistake of simplifying the problem, because these two cases are quite incomparable, buying Chinese cabbage is a private event, but this one-dollar lawsuit is of great significance. We will not tell the truth for the person who bought Chinese cabbage in Dongcheng District, but However, we will find that this Shanxi teacher is blushing and thick-necked. He confuses the basic concepts. Violating often does not mean that it is not always before the fact judgment, but after the moral judgment. Worse, violating often does not mean that it is not sexual. A law should not be a moral theory. This is a cover and clarification for the fact analysis.
The biggest experience of this on-site discussion on telling the truth is that the public opinion in China is too powerful, and morality often overwhelms the theoretical conclusion. The fact analysis deviates from its passing and enters the entangled moral field early. It is commendable that a people’s speech program can fully show all kinds of views on the spot, but can we make the problem go deeper in the laughter? I think telling the truth is not equal to telling the truth, so it is a measure to joke, but it is also a limit to preach in the correct way.
In 1999,
Strangle all ideological bugs.
Playing Bug Che Guevara in the last winter of the century is a meaningful cultural action and ideological debate. Finally, in this red century, the last red capital drama form has been given to the generation, although this generation is vague and has nothing to say, although this generation is nothing more than a holiday madness and an expensive but elegant bourgeois culture in the eyes of those guys and girls who have no experience in class struggle and no ideological complex.